tj

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
tj [11/12/2025 16:35] – [2 October 2025: Escalation and Threat] danieltj [11/12/2025 16:46] (current) – [Warning to TJ] daniel
Line 23: Line 23:
 Confirmation of double-psychiatrist non-delusional rulings; cautionary warning of publicity if ignored. Confirmation of double-psychiatrist non-delusional rulings; cautionary warning of publicity if ignored.
  
-===== 10 December 2025: Ultimatum =====+==== 10 December 2025: Ultimatum ====
 "Final opportunity to prove that Targeted Justice is not, in fact, a counterintelligence operation... Non-response will be seen as an admission." "Final opportunity to prove that Targeted Justice is not, in fact, a counterintelligence operation... Non-response will be seen as an admission."
  
-===== 11 December 2025: TJ Response =====+==== 11 December 2025: TJ Response ====
 Defensive list of "accomplishments"; baseless defamation claim without addressing evidence. Defensive list of "accomplishments"; baseless defamation claim without addressing evidence.
  
 **Full email correspondence chain available on request** **Full email correspondence chain available on request**
  
-==== Analysis: No Engagement on Merits ====+===== Analysis: No Engagement on Merits =====
  
 TJ never queried my data: no questions on VHF violations, qEEG inversions (contra Van Lutterveld et al.), Trends breakpoints (2016 neuroweapon surge via ITS regression), or Bayesian posteriors (99.9994% state-targeting). Silence persisted despite <redacted>'s vouch and my offers aligning with TJ's purported mission (AHI registry expansion, *Garland* acceleration). TJ never queried my data: no questions on VHF violations, qEEG inversions (contra Van Lutterveld et al.), Trends breakpoints (2016 neuroweapon surge via ITS regression), or Bayesian posteriors (99.9994% state-targeting). Silence persisted despite <redacted>'s vouch and my offers aligning with TJ's purported mission (AHI registry expansion, *Garland* acceleration).
Line 49: Line 49:
 This exchange shows a very high probability for TJ obstruction (dilution of TI signals, protection of perpetrators). This exchange shows a very high probability for TJ obstruction (dilution of TI signals, protection of perpetrators).
  
-==== Comparative Assessment of Good Faith ====+===== Comparative Assessment of Good Faith =====
  
 In a comparison, the-neuro-holocaust.com emerges as the more credible actor in good faith. Here's a structured breakdown: In a comparison, the-neuro-holocaust.com emerges as the more credible actor in good faith. Here's a structured breakdown:
Line 67: Line 67:
  
 You really don't want to sue me. It would clear my way to a courtroom faster than anything I am capable of, and I will win every argument. You really don't want to sue me. It would clear my way to a courtroom faster than anything I am capable of, and I will win every argument.
 +
 +-----
 +
 +{{counter|total| person visited this page.| people visited this page.}}
/var/www/html/data/attic/tj.1765470928.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel