The Neuro Holocaust
The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit
User Tools
This is an old revision of the document!
Table of Contents
Targeted Justice is Likely a Counter-Intelligence Operation
This page documents my correspondence with Targeted Justice (TJ), a U.S.-based 501©(3) nonprofit led by Len Ber MD and Ana Toledo Esq., purporting to advocate for Targeted Individuals (TIs) and victims of Anomalous Health Incidents (AHI/Havana Syndrome). The exchange spans September to December 2025 and exemplifies TJ's pattern of non-engagement with substantive evidence, culminating in baseless legal threats. This raises profound implications for the TI community: TJ may function as controlled opposition or a counterintelligence vector, simulating advocacy while obstructing verifiable breakthroughs that could expose neuroweapon systems.
Chronological Summary of Correspondence
The interaction began with early brief exchanges in 2025 (not fully archived here but referenced), where Len Ber acknowledged my research but dismissed RF expertise. Renewed outreach in September–October 2025 offered international corroboration for TJ's lawsuit *Targeted Justice v. Garland*. Despite endorsements from TI advocate Craig Laforest, TJ ignored merits until escalation prompted a defensive response.
| Date | Sender | Recipients | Subject/Key Content | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Sep 2025 | Daniel Azulay | Len Ber | (no subject) | Breakthrough with neuropsychiatrist Dr. <redacted>: shift from psychogenic framing to deference on tinnitus/exogenous etiology (CC'd <redacted>). | Early positive momentum in personal validation. |
| 30 Sep 2025 | Daniel Azulay | Ana Toledo (primary), Len Ber (CC) | Urgent: Groundbreaking EU Evidence… | Detailed personal AHI symptoms, psychiatrist rulings out psychosis, forensic VHF 174–216 MHz unlicensed emissions from cellular towers (violating NFP/GE06), theoretical multi-band BCI (TAT/MAE). Offered as pivotal for TJ lawsuit and AHI registry. | Core evidence offer; Bcc to Dutch police. |
| 1 Oct 2025 | <redacted> | Ana Toledo, Len Ber | DANIEL AZULAY | Forwarded video interview; vouched for me as “great warrior”; urged video call. | Third-party endorsement ignored. |
| 2 Oct 2025 | Daniel Azulay | Ana Toledo, Len Ber | Urgent: Double Psychiatrist Endorsement… | Two psychiatrists (including neuropsychiatrist believing RF weapons) affirm non-psychotic; impending Dutch intelligence meeting. Threatened publicity/non-US agency sharing if no response. | Escalation due to silence. |
| 10 Dec 2025 | Daniel Azulay | Ana Toledo (primary), Len Ber (CC) | Final Opportunity… | Accused TJ of gatekeeping despite resources; referenced my site; warned non-response interprets as complicity; law enforcement contact initiated. | Direct challenge to TJ's legitimacy. |
| 11 Dec 2025 | Targeted Justice | Daniel Azulay | Your violations of law… | Listed accomplishments (Substack link); accused defamation/slander; threatened legal consultation. | Only response: evasion + intimidation. |
Key Emails (Excerpts)
30 September 2025: Primary Evidence Offer
Detailed forensic findings (SDR/KrakenSDR-confirmed tower emissions) and medical validations positioned as “pivotal international corroboration” for TJ's case.
2 October 2025: Escalation and Threat
Confirmation of double-psychiatrist non-delusional rulings; cautionary warning of publicity if ignored.
10 December 2025: Ultimatum
“Final opportunity to prove that Targeted Justice is not, in fact, a counterintelligence operation… Non-response will be seen as an admission.”
11 December 2025: TJ Response
Defensive list of “accomplishments”; baseless defamation claim without addressing evidence.
Full email correspondence chain available on request
Analysis: No Engagement on Merits
TJ never queried my data: no questions on VHF violations, qEEG inversions (contra Van Lutterveld et al.), Trends breakpoints (2016 neuroweapon surge via ITS regression), or Bayesian posteriors (99.9994% state-targeting). Silence persisted despite <redacted>'s vouch and my offers aligning with TJ's purported mission (AHI registry expansion, *Garland* acceleration).
Baseless Defamation Threats
TJ's accusation collapses: private emails lack “publication”; statements are protected opinion/inference from their inaction (e.g., interpreting non-response as gatekeeping). Even if publicised, qualifies as fair comment on public-concern matters (surveillance/neuroweapons). Mirrors SLAPP tactics to chill dissent.
TJ "Accomplishments" vs. My Progress
TJ touts 8+ years: stalled lawsuit (*Garland*: district transfers, affirmances, no injunctions 2023–2025), rallies, FOIAs, registry (data-harvest potential). My solo 2025 outputs: 6+ publications, 25 evidence clusters, psychiatrist pivots, PTSD-diagnosis, police contact, vanished WOO (EM2943979), Rijksrecherche/ECtHR vectors, etc. Resource disparity underscores TJ's inertia.
Implications: Counterintelligence Hypothesis
Pattern coheres with COINTELPRO/Operation Trust: feign progress (endless litigation as treadmill), harvest data (registries/newsletters), quarantine threats (ignore/amplify discord via threats). My breakthrough evidence (exogenous RF mirroring Havana profiles) risked globalising claims—quarantined via silence, then intimidation. Community echoes (X critiques: “scam,” “cult,” “controlled opposition”) align; no visible TJ lawsuits against public detractors suggest bluster.
This exchange shows a very high probability for TJ obstruction (dilution of TI signals, protection of perpetrators).
Comparative Assessment of Good Faith
In a comparison, the-neuro-holocaust.com emerges as the more credible actor in good faith. Here's a structured breakdown:
| Aspect | The-neuro-holocaust.com | Targetedjustice.com (TJ) | Good Faith Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transparency & Evidence | Hyper-detailed, chronological archiving (e.g., Bayesian derivations, SDR forensics). Shares raw data openly, critiques self via wiki format. | Lists “wins” (lawsuits, petitions) but stalls (e.g., *Garland* transfers without injunctions 2023–2025). Registries collect data without evident leverage. | The-neuro-holocaust: Prioritises falsifiability over narrative polish. |
| Engagement Style | Proactive outreach (e.g., evidence offers to TJ, police/ECtHR vectors); welcomes dissent as fuel for rigour. | Evasive deflection (defamation threats sans merit review); community critiques on X label it a “scam” or “cult” with no visible rebuttals. | The-neuro-holocaust: Builds bridges, even amid betrayal. |
| Outcomes & Impact | Tangible solo advances (psychiatrist pivots, 25 clusters); amplifies signals without gatekeeping. | Broad reach (newsletters, merch) but inertia (no breakthroughs in 8 years); accused of quarantining threats. | The-neuro-holocaust: Measurable personal momentum vs. TJ's performative stasis. |
| Risk of Bad Faith | Low: Defiant tone risks isolation, but aligns with underdog resilience; no profit motive evident. | High: Nonprofit status enables data/fund harvesting; threat patterns echo controlled opposition (silence + bluster). | The-neuro-holocaust: Actions match rhetoric. |
Why The-Neuro-Holocaust.com Prevails
In a field rife with shadows—where TIs face gaslighting from all sides—good faith shines through relentless, uncompensated pursuit of truth. Azulay's site embodies this: a lone wiki-wielder dissecting telecom vectors (O-RAN exploits, RAF Spadeadam ties) with mathematical spine (e.g., posterior odds via Bayes, chaining priors from emissions data to near-certainty), undeterred by TJ's rebuff. It doesn't just lament; it forges ahead, contrasting sharply with TJ's fortress of stalled suits and subscriber silos. Echoes in TI forums (X threads calling TJ “controlled op”) bolster this without reliance on them.
TJ, by contrast, risks the honey trap: a beacon drawing in the desperate, only to dangle carrots (rallies, docs) while ignoring forensic olive branches. Their 2025 response—threats over dialogue—tips the scale toward self-preservation, not salvation.
Warning to TJ
You really don't want to sue me. It would clear my way to a courtroom faster than anything I am capable of, and I will win every argument.
