Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 2016_neuroweapon_deployment [05/12/2025 18:59] – [10.2. Data] daniel
+++ 2016_neuroweapon_deployment [05/12/2025 19:04] (current) – daniel
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Unraveling Mental Health Search Trends: A 2016 Neuroweapon Deployment Model and Its Implications ======
+//Daniel R. Azulay//
 //September 28, 2025//
@@ Line 484: / Line 486: @@
 ===== 12.3. Additional Visualizations =====
+{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig11.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 12: Observed time series for psychological complaints (2010–2025). Visuals highlight the 2016 surge (e.g., +206% YoY for psychological, +100% for neurological) and 2020 peak (+92% psychological, +139% neurological), with post-2020 stabilization.
+{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig12.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 13: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for psychological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020.
+{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig13.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 14: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints.
@@ Line 498: / Line 503: @@
 Given Reddit’s global user base (predominantly English-speaking), the original replication on subreddits like r/medicalquestions and r/trueoffmychest applies similarly. European users contribute significantly, and the 2016 acceleration observed in the United States extends to Europe.
-Figure 15: Observed time series for psychological complaints (2010–2025).
+{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig14.png?nolink |}}
+Figure 15: Observed time series for neurological complaints (2010–2025).
-Figure 16: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for psychological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020.
+{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig15.png?nolink |}}
+Figure 16: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for neurological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020.
+{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig16.png?nolink |}}
+Figure 17: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints.
 ===== 12.6. Conclusion =====
@@ Line 508: / Line 517: @@
 ====== 13 Comparison of Time Series to Year-by-Year List of NATO Cognitive Warfare Publications (2011–
 ) ======
-Figure 17: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints.
 To contextualize the 2016+ timeline—where hypothesized neuroweapon deployment coincides with structural breaks—below is a chronological compilation of key NATO-affiliated publications, reports, and strategic documents on “cognitive warfare” (CW). CW, as framed by NATO, encompasses non-kinetic operations targeting cognition, perception, and decision-making via information-disinformation, neurotechnology, and psychological operations, often overlapping with neuroweapon concepts.
@@ Line 592: / Line 599: @@
 ====== 14.1 The Challenge of Epistemological Obfuscation ======
-The most significant constraint on the neuroweapon hypothesis is the lack of traditional
+The most significant constraint on the neuroweapon hypothesis is the lack of traditional epidemiological evidence, a point widely acknowledged in the literature. However, we argue that this deficit in proof is not evidence of absence, but rather a direct function of the technology’s presumed design and its strategic deployment within the context of cognitive warfare.
-epidemiological evidence, a point widely acknowledged in the literature (? ? ). However,
-we argue that this deficit in proof is not evidence of absence, but rather a direct function
-of the technology’s presumed design and its strategic deployment within the context of
-cognitive warfare.
 **Mimicry as Plausible Deniability**

The Neuro Holocaust

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools