The Neuro HolocaustThe AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| rnm_tscm [15/12/2025 23:13] – [Core Countermeasure: Antenna-Enhanced Hat] daniel | rnm_tscm [15/12/2025 23:22] (current) – [Construction and Cost Notes] daniel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Guide to Protecting Against Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM), V2K, and Microwave Attacks ====== | ====== Guide to Protecting Against Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM), V2K, and Microwave Attacks ====== | ||
| - | Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) is a sophisticated form of microwave radiometry that employs AI-driven skull position tracking to maintain precise beam alignment. The system directs a focused microwave beam that circles within the brain, interacting with neural structures to acquire radar-like returns encoding brain activity. | + | Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) is a sophisticated form of microwave radiometry that employs AI-driven skull position tracking to maintain precise beam alignment. |
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | The system directs a focused microwave beam that circles within the brain, interacting with neural structures to acquire radar-like returns encoding brain activity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The readout of illumination by this beam enables real-time | ||
| To counter this, the core strategy disrupts the radar returns critical for signal acquisition and beam stability. | To counter this, the core strategy disrupts the radar returns critical for signal acquisition and beam stability. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 25: | ||
| ===== Two Implementation Approaches ===== | ===== Two Implementation Approaches ===== | ||
| - | 1. **Passive Mode** | + | 1. **Passive Mode:** |
| | | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| - | 2. **Active Mode** | + | 2. **Active Mode:** |
| - | Link antennas to an RF signal generator producing randomised chirps or noise, amplified for transmission. Test prototypes using a HackRF One as the source paired with a low-noise amplifier (LNA, e.g., 20–30 dB gain in the 2–3 GHz band). This actively jams the specific frequency range, providing targeted disruption. Randomised waveforms prevent AI adaptation. | + | Link antennas to an RF signal generator producing randomised chirps or noise waveforms, amplified for transmission. Test prototypes using a HackRF One as the source paired with a low-noise amplifier (LNA, e.g., 20–30 dB gain in the 2–3 GHz band). This actively jams the specific frequency range, providing targeted disruption. Randomised waveforms prevent AI adaptation. |
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| - | Both methods inject noise into the return path, preventing accurate neural state feedback. This blocks RNM readout and disrupts V2K, as the system loses precise targeting and response calibration. | + | Both methods inject |
| ===== Construction and Cost Notes ===== | ===== Construction and Cost Notes ===== | ||
| - | - Full coverage requires 15–20 small patches for effective scattering. | + | * Full coverage requires 15–20 small patches for effective scattering. |
| - | - Total cost per hat: under $30 using bulk components and basic fabrication. | + | |
| - | - Layer antennas densely on fabric or a baseball cap for conformal fit. | + | |
| ===== Additional Benefits and Development ===== | ===== Additional Benefits and Development ===== | ||