Another documented case of outreach to a prominent Targeted Individual advocacy organisation—ICATOR (International Coalition Against Electronic Torture and Robotisation of Living Beings), founded and led by Melanie V.—that followed the exact same pattern observed with Targeted Justice.
Initial polite engagement and scheduling of collaboration → repeated postponements and de-prioritisation → complete non-engagement with offered evidence and simple community-benefiting requests → defensive legal threats (defamation/harassment) when confronted on the obstruction.
This parallel behaviour across two supposedly independent organisations strongly indicates containment operations masquerading as advocacy: entities that collect donations, maintain visibility, and simulate progress while systematically quarantining or stifling reproducible evidence that could force real institutional accountability.
Targeted Individuals, already isolated and traumatised, become easy prey for such structures—offering hope and community while ensuring no genuine breakthroughs escape containment.
The full WhatsApp conversation, transcribed verbatim from encrypted chat screenshots.
21/09/2025
Daniel: Detailed introductory message (as shown in attached images) outlining Bayesian coercive-persuasion framework, optical vibrometry detection concept, thermoacoustic telecom models, Havana Syndrome parsimonious explanation, statistical tinnitus/voice-hearing overlap, proposal for rigorous collaboration under ICATOR umbrella. Offers phone call or meeting, in Dutch if preferred.
Attachment: DOC-20250920-WA0012.
23/09/2025
MELANIE V.: Hello, nice to meet you. Craig said, you wanted to come to Brussels?
Daniel: Yes, flexible dates.
MELANIE V.: Suggests 7 Oct or 10 Oct.
Daniel: Chooses 7 Oct, asks meeting details.
Attachments: DOC-20250923-WA0003 (something “we can possibly use”).
MELANIE V.: Suggests BELCHICKEN KRAAINEM at 13:30.
Daniel: Agrees, confirms arrival by train.
MELANIE V.: Looking forward.
24/09/2025 – 28/09/2025
Daniel: Additional attachments (DOC-20250924-WA0000, DOC-20250928-WA0000).
01/10/2025 – 02/10/2025
Postponement cycle begins: Daniel suggests video call due to travel fatigue; Melanie V. cancels citing daughter's accident and pre-holiday workload, proposes after 2 November.
Daniel: Offers to share full work via Google Drive, mentions two psychiatrist endorsements and spectrum evidence.
25/11/2025
Daniel: Requests phone call, reports progress with police and “tangible evidence”.
MELANIE V.: Cannot give legal advice, no appointments due to court/UN prep. “All victims cases treated equally… we do not enter in individual cases.”
Daniel: Clarifies not asking for help but offering explanation (per Craig's prior request).
MELANIE V.: Provides email: <redacted>.
29/11/2025
Daniel: Forwards detailed technical analysis on RF measurements (as shown in attached images):
No response or acknowledgment.
06/12/2025
Daniel: Shares website link.
24/12/2025
Daniel: Requests minimal assistance disseminating anonymous voice-hearing questionnaire to TI community (as shown in attached images)—low-effort, high-impact tool to cluster symptoms vs psychiatric patients and potentially convince psychiatry using their own methods.
Provides ready-to-share message with Google Forms link.
No response.
29/12/2025
Daniel: Announces intent to call with major progress and media potential. “Please show me you are serious about this.”
MELANIE V.: Closed for Christmas, spending time with family.
Daniel: Accuses controlled opposition due to refusal to cooperate with “most successful efforts”.
30/12/2025
MELANIE V.: Boasts UN speaking engagement based on “removed implants”. Threatens to forward “threatening message” to board, cites defamation law.
Daniel: Notes identical response from Targeted Justice.
MELANIE V.: Distinguishes organisations but notes similar accusations, saves exchange as proof of harassment/defamation, ends communication.
Daniel: Rejects claims: no defamation occurred (only factual criticism of public behaviour and documented non-engagement). Highlights legal knowledge, warns against smear, announces intent to publish exchange (redacted) as protected opinion.
The pattern is identical to Targeted Justice:
On the defamation/slander claims: I never defamed or slandered Melanie V. or ICATOR. All statements were:
Accusing someone of defamation without basis—precisely to silence criticism—is a recognised intimidation tactic. Both organisations deployed it word-for-word when evidence threatened their narrative control.
| Phase | Targeted Justice | ICATOR (Melanie V.) |
|---|---|---|
| Initial response | Polite, open to evidence | Polite, schedules in-person meeting |
| Handling of evidence offers | Ignored, no questions | Ignored, no questions |
| Response to simple requests | Obstructed | Obstructed (questionnaire dissemination) |
| Reaction to confrontation | Defamation/slander threat | Defamation/harassment threat |
| Substantive rebuttal | None | None (boasts UN appearance instead) |
| Outcome for TI community | Evidence quarantined | Evidence quarantined |
This is not coincidence or overload—it is coordinated containment.
Another sad, textbook example of how genuine breakthroughs by Targeted Individuals are met with obstruction and intimidation by the very organisations claiming to represent them.
The record stands clear. Any attempted legal action would only amplify these patterns and accelerate exposure.
Progress continues independently. The truth cannot be contained forever.