====== ICATOR is likely a counter-intelligence operation: exchange with Melanie V. (ICATOR) ======

Another documented case of outreach to a prominent Targeted Individual advocacy organisation—**ICATOR** (International Coalition Against Electronic Torture and Robotisation of Living Beings), founded and led by Melanie V.—that followed the **exact same pattern** observed with Targeted Justice.

Initial polite engagement and scheduling of collaboration → repeated postponements and de-prioritisation → complete non-engagement with offered evidence and simple community-benefiting requests → defensive legal threats (defamation/harassment) when confronted on the obstruction.

This parallel behaviour across two supposedly independent organisations strongly indicates **containment operations** masquerading as advocacy: entities that collect donations, maintain visibility, and simulate progress while systematically quarantining or stifling reproducible evidence that could force real institutional accountability.

Targeted Individuals, already isolated and traumatised, become easy prey for such structures—offering hope and community while ensuring no genuine breakthroughs escape containment.

=== Chronological Exchange (September – December 2025) ===

The full WhatsApp conversation, transcribed verbatim from encrypted chat screenshots.

**21/09/2025**

**Daniel:** Detailed introductory message (as shown in attached images) outlining Bayesian coercive-persuasion framework, optical vibrometry detection concept, thermoacoustic telecom models, Havana Syndrome parsimonious explanation, statistical tinnitus/voice-hearing overlap, proposal for rigorous collaboration under ICATOR umbrella. Offers phone call or meeting, in Dutch if preferred.

**Attachment:** DOC-20250920-WA0012.

**23/09/2025**

**MELANIE V.:** Hello, nice to meet you. Craig said, you wanted to come to Brussels?

**Daniel:** Yes, flexible dates.

**MELANIE V.:** Suggests 7 Oct or 10 Oct.

**Daniel:** Chooses 7 Oct, asks meeting details.

**Attachments:** DOC-20250923-WA0003 (something "we can possibly use").

**MELANIE V.:** Suggests BELCHICKEN KRAAINEM at 13:30.

**Daniel:** Agrees, confirms arrival by train.

**MELANIE V.:** Looking forward.

**24/09/2025 – 28/09/2025**

**Daniel:** Additional attachments (DOC-20250924-WA0000, DOC-20250928-WA0000).

**01/10/2025 – 02/10/2025**

Postponement cycle begins: Daniel suggests video call due to travel fatigue; Melanie V. cancels citing daughter's accident and pre-holiday workload, proposes after 2 November.

**Daniel:** Offers to share full work via Google Drive, mentions two psychiatrist endorsements and spectrum evidence.

**25/11/2025**

**Daniel:** Requests phone call, reports progress with police and "tangible evidence".

**MELANIE V.:** Cannot give legal advice, no appointments due to court/UN prep. "All victims cases treated equally... we do not enter in individual cases."

**Daniel:** Clarifies not asking for help but offering explanation (per Craig's prior request).

**MELANIE V.:** Provides email: <redacted>.

**29/11/2025**

**Daniel:** Forwards detailed technical analysis on RF measurements (as shown in attached images):

  * Unordered List ItemPersistent narrowband transmitter detectable only centimetres from head
  * Operating precisely in KPN/ODIDO uplink bands (2538.04 MHz & 2545.15 MHz)
  * Statistically impossible spatial/frequency behaviour for legitimate sources
  * Described as "court-ready, mathematically airtight proof" of unauthorised transmitter
  * Offers forensic reports, IQ analysis, expert declarations

No response or acknowledgment.

**06/12/2025**

**Daniel:** Shares website link.

**24/12/2025**

**Daniel:** Requests minimal assistance disseminating anonymous voice-hearing questionnaire to TI community (as shown in attached images)—low-effort, high-impact tool to cluster symptoms vs psychiatric patients and potentially convince psychiatry using their own methods.

Provides ready-to-share message with Google Forms link.

No response.

**29/12/2025**

**Daniel:** Announces intent to call with major progress and media potential. "Please show me you are serious about this."

**MELANIE V.:** Closed for Christmas, spending time with family.

**Daniel:** Accuses controlled opposition due to refusal to cooperate with "most successful efforts".

**30/12/2025**

**MELANIE V.:** Boasts UN speaking engagement based on "removed implants". Threatens to forward "threatening message" to board, cites defamation law.

**Daniel:** Notes identical response from Targeted Justice.

**MELANIE V.:** Distinguishes organisations but notes similar accusations, saves exchange as proof of harassment/defamation, ends communication.

**Daniel:** Rejects claims: no defamation occurred (only factual criticism of public behaviour and documented non-engagement). Highlights legal knowledge, warns against smear, announces intent to publish exchange (redacted) as protected opinion.

=== Analysis of Tactics and Extreme Similarities ===

The pattern is **identical** to Targeted Justice:

  - **Initial openness** when outreach is abstract → scheduling meetings.
  - **Systematic de-prioritisation** → repeated delays, excuses (family, holidays, court prep).
  - **Zero substantive engagement** with offered evidence (psychiatrist-backed models, reproducible RF proof, community questionnaire)—no questions, no integration proposals.
  - **Obstruction of low-effort, high-benefit actions** that would directly advance community goals.
  - **Escalation to baseless legal intimidation** when confronted: "defamation", "harassment", "threatening message"—**without ever addressing the merits**.

**On the defamation/slander claims:**  
I never defamed or slandered Melanie V. or ICATOR. All statements were:
  * Factual descriptions of documented non-responses and obstructions.
  * Protected opinion on public organisational behaviour ("controlled opposition" based on observed containment pattern).
  * Direct quotes or paraphrases of the exchange itself.

Accusing someone of defamation without basis—precisely to silence criticism—is a recognised intimidation tactic. Both organisations deployed it word-for-word when evidence threatened their narrative control.

=== Comparative Table: Containment Pattern ===

^Phase ^ Targeted Justice ^ ICATOR (Melanie V.) ^
| Initial response               | Polite, open to evidence                  | Polite, schedules in-person meeting      |
| Handling of evidence offers    | Ignored, no questions                     | Ignored, no questions                    |
| Response to simple requests    | Obstructed                                | Obstructed (questionnaire dissemination) |
| Reaction to confrontation      | Defamation/slander threat                 | Defamation/harassment threat             |
| Substantive rebuttal           | None                                      | None (boasts UN appearance instead)      |
| Outcome for TI community       | Evidence quarantined                      | Evidence quarantined       |        

This is not coincidence or overload—it is **coordinated containment**.

=== Conclusion ===

Another sad, textbook example of how genuine breakthroughs by Targeted Individuals are met with obstruction and intimidation by the very organisations claiming to represent them.

The record stands clear. Any attempted legal action would only amplify these patterns and accelerate exposure.

Progress continues independently. The truth cannot be contained forever.