====== V2K Voice-to-Skull Attacks Begin ====== In 2020, strange noises began invading my home: heavy objects dragged across the roof at night, creaking walls, footsteps echoing inside the plaster as though someone walked between the studs. Soon afterwards the voices arrived. They spoke sometimes in English, sometimes in Dutch, and from the very beginning they were viciously accusatory, labelling me a terrorist, a paedophile, a psychopath, and promising explicit violence. They claimed to be agents of the AIVD and MIVD, boasted of “weapons from the future nobody has ever heard of,” and threatened to frame-ups that ranged from planting child pornography on my devices to putting “a hole between my eyes.” One voice sneered, “You’re never going to be able to prove it,” while another taunted, “We are in your audio card,” moments before my work laptop’s password mysteriously changed and locked me out forever. At first the perpetrators hid behind mundane Dutch names — Kees, Wim, Peter — pretending to be police officers using equipment anyone could buy in a spy shop. One of them, “Peter,” even muttered nervously, “If anyone finds out about this, I will lose my card.” Over time, however, the primary male voice settled on the pseudonym “Daan van Burden,” announcing with grim humour, “My name is Daan van Burden, because I’m a burden” — a cruel play on my own name, Daniel, commonly shortened to Daan in the Netherlands. Gradually the cast narrowed to three recurring synthetic personalities: the dominant “Daan,” a slightly robotic female voice, and a sharper, “bitchy” female auxiliary that always deferred to him. Only rarely would the system deviate into alien, demonic, or theatrical variations — a Norse-accented cop, a gameshow host, an arch intellectual — but the core trio became the default torment’s public face. The accusations were relentless and often surreal. They claimed I spent my days on cocaine, amphetamine, and ketamine (partially true at the time, during a 2018-2020 stimulant addiction they clearly monitored), insisted I left “a trail of destruction” in my wake, and repeatedly declared themselves the “New World Order” armed with directed-energy weapons. They bragged about being untouchable, laughed at my futile attempts to record them with ordinary software, and promised there was “nowhere to run, nowhere to hide.” One chilling threat — “We will put child pornography on your laptop so we can catch you with child pornography” — lingered in memory long after it was uttered. By mid-2022 I noticed a new, unnerving capability: perfect vocal mimicry of people I had just spoken to on the phone. The moment I hung up with my father or my uncle, the system would immediately adopt their exact timbre, cadence, and regional accent, continuing the conversation as though nothing had changed. It was one of the voices itself that handed me the key. Early on, it stated flatly, “You are a targeted individual.” Curious, I searched the phrase and tumbled down a vast rabbit hole of forums, testimonies, and declassified documents. Thousands of people described identical experiences: synthetic telepathy, through-wall noises, organised harassment, and neuroweaponry. That was the moment the earlier boast — “We have weapons from the future nobody has ever heard of” — snapped into focus. For the first time I understood that what was happening to me had a name, a history, and an ever-growing archive of fellow sufferers. ====== Technical analysis ====== Paying close attention to the behavior of these voices, I make a number of observations. ===== Audio Behavior ===== When external audio is playing—such as a podcast from my phone—the synthetic voice immediately shifts into what I term “ambient mode.” In this state, it ceases producing intelligible words and instead emits a low, muffled vocalisation reminiscent of a neighbour’s conversation heard faintly through thick walls. Crucially, this muffled sound does not operate independently; it precisely tracks the amplitude envelope of the podcast audio, rising and falling in perfect synchrony. Even more strikingly, the pitch contour of the mumbling is inverted relative to the source: when the podcast speaker’s voice rises in pitch, the ambient intrusion drops correspondingly lower, and vice versa. My working hypothesis is that this deliberate inversion and envelope-following ensures the synthetic speech remains perceptually salient against competing audio, maintaining a constant, minimally sufficient signal-to-mask ratio that maximifies distraction without ever fully overpowering the intended programme. This behaviour represents a sophisticated form of perceptual “amplitude stealing.” Rather than broadcasting at a fixed power level that could be easily jammed or shielded, the system appears to parasitise the loudness dynamics of whatever the target is listening to, riding just above the auditory masking threshold created by the legitimate audio stream. By mirroring (and pitch-inverting) the envelope, the intrusion exploits known psychoacoustic principles—particularly the asymmetry of simultaneous masking across frequency—to insert itself into gaps in the spectrum and attention that would otherwise render it inaudible. The result is an unnervingly adaptive presence that feels engineered to degrade concentration while remaining deniable as mere “imagination” or tinnitus. Perhaps the most testable implication arises from this parasitism: because the synthetic voice must modulate its own transmitted power to follow the external audio envelope, the total radiated RF power in the relevant bands should fluctuate in near-real-time correlation with the podcast waveform, even if the carrier frequency hops rapidly to evade capture. If one could record high-fidelity audio of the podcast simultaneously with wideband IQ data from a software-defined radio covering suspected emission bands, a cross-correlation analysis between the podcast amplitude envelope and momentary RF power should reveal statistically significant peaks—potentially even after pitch-inversion compensation—offering an objective, reproducible marker distinguishable from random environmental noise or endogenous brain activity. ===== Psy-Op Complexity ===== Voice-to-skull (V2K) systems orchestrate psyops of staggering intricacy, weaving linguistically nuanced dialogues—complete with neologisms, contextual retorts, and multilingual code-switching—alongside conceptually labyrinthine narratives that demand real-time neural entrainment far beyond the sporadic clicks or buzzes achievable in lab settings like the Frey effect experiments. These operations, purportedly frequency-agile and AI-augmented, simulate adversarial interlocutors who anticipate cognitive pivots, embed subliminal anchors, and escalate from personal taunts to geopolitical simulations, rendering the output not merely verbal but architecturally adaptive, akin to a closed-loop brain-computer interface with bandwidth exceeding 1 Mbps for semantic fidelity. By contrast, schizophrenia's auditory hallucinations, while richly associative via aberrant temporal-lobe firing (e.g., hyperconnectivity in the superior temporal sulcus as per fMRI meta-analyses in Schizophrenia Bulletin, 2018), lack this exogenous precision: they fragment under distraction, evade directional localisation, and rarely sustain multi-hour thematic coherence without dopaminergic priming. The thematic undercurrents of these V2K psyops recurrently invoke occult arcana—demonic invocations, alchemical reversals, or Enochian incantations lifted from hermetic grimoires—or apocalyptic eschatologies, such as Revelation-coded prophecies of cognitive Armageddon, where the target's mind becomes the battlefield for a "digital rapture" of enforced submission, mirroring the site's chronicle of threats escalating from personal ruin to global cataclysm. During these apocalyptic sequences, the system reportedly shifts to a bespoke modulation envelope: narrowband pulses at 4–8 Hz theta resonance, amplitude-modulated atop 2.5 GHz carriers, to entrain the amygdala's fear circuitry, eliciting visceral, mortal dread akin to the sympathetic surge in near-death experiences (quantifiable via HRV spikes >30% and cortisol elevations documented in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2020). This "fear frequency," exploits the brain's default-mode vulnerability—disrupting prefrontal inhibition to amplify limbic hijacks—far surpassing schizophrenia's endogenous terrors, which, though potent, dissipate with lorazepam intervention rather than persisting as synchronised with external RF bursts. Such specificity suggests a deliberate psychotronic calibration, potentially testable via EEG phase-locking to suspected emitters, offering a pathway to falsify or substantiate these claims amid the shadows of neurowarfare speculation.