Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- tj [11/12/2025 16:35] – [11 December 2025: TJ Response] daniel
+++ tj [11/12/2025 16:46] (current) – [Warning to TJ] daniel
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 **Full email correspondence chain available on request**
-==== Analysis: No Engagement on Merits ====
+===== Analysis: No Engagement on Merits =====
 TJ never queried my data: no questions on VHF violations, qEEG inversions (contra Van Lutterveld et al.), Trends breakpoints (2016 neuroweapon surge via ITS regression), or Bayesian posteriors (99.9994% state-targeting). Silence persisted despite <redacted>'s vouch and my offers aligning with TJ's purported mission (AHI registry expansion, *Garland* acceleration).
@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 This exchange shows a very high probability for TJ obstruction (dilution of TI signals, protection of perpetrators).
-==== Comparative Assessment of Good Faith ====
+===== Comparative Assessment of Good Faith =====
 In a comparison, the-neuro-holocaust.com emerges as the more credible actor in good faith. Here's a structured breakdown:
@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 You really don't want to sue me. It would clear my way to a courtroom faster than anything I am capable of, and I will win every argument.
+-----
+{{counter|total| person visited this page.| people visited this page.}}

The Neuro Holocaust