The Neuro Holocaust
The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit
User Tools
tj
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| tj [11/12/2025 16:35] – [Chronological Summary of Correspondence] daniel | tj [11/12/2025 16:46] (current) – [Warning to TJ] daniel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| | 11 Dec 2025 | Targeted Justice | Daniel Azulay | Your violations of law... | Listed accomplishments (Substack link); accused defamation/ | | 11 Dec 2025 | Targeted Justice | Daniel Azulay | Your violations of law... | Listed accomplishments (Substack link); accused defamation/ | ||
| - | ==== Key Emails (Excerpts) ==== | + | ===== Key Emails (Excerpts) |
| - | ===== 30 September 2025: Primary Evidence Offer ===== | + | ==== 30 September 2025: Primary Evidence Offer ==== |
| Detailed forensic findings (SDR/ | Detailed forensic findings (SDR/ | ||
| - | ===== 2 October 2025: Escalation and Threat | + | ==== 2 October 2025: Escalation and Threat ==== |
| Confirmation of double-psychiatrist non-delusional rulings; cautionary warning of publicity if ignored. | Confirmation of double-psychiatrist non-delusional rulings; cautionary warning of publicity if ignored. | ||
| - | ===== 10 December 2025: Ultimatum | + | ==== 10 December 2025: Ultimatum ==== |
| "Final opportunity to prove that Targeted Justice is not, in fact, a counterintelligence operation... Non-response will be seen as an admission." | "Final opportunity to prove that Targeted Justice is not, in fact, a counterintelligence operation... Non-response will be seen as an admission." | ||
| - | ===== 11 December 2025: TJ Response | + | ==== 11 December 2025: TJ Response ==== |
| Defensive list of " | Defensive list of " | ||
| **Full email correspondence chain available on request** | **Full email correspondence chain available on request** | ||
| - | ==== Analysis: No Engagement on Merits ==== | + | ===== Analysis: No Engagement on Merits |
| TJ never queried my data: no questions on VHF violations, qEEG inversions (contra Van Lutterveld et al.), Trends breakpoints (2016 neuroweapon surge via ITS regression), | TJ never queried my data: no questions on VHF violations, qEEG inversions (contra Van Lutterveld et al.), Trends breakpoints (2016 neuroweapon surge via ITS regression), | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| This exchange shows a very high probability for TJ obstruction (dilution of TI signals, protection of perpetrators). | This exchange shows a very high probability for TJ obstruction (dilution of TI signals, protection of perpetrators). | ||
| - | ==== Comparative Assessment of Good Faith ==== | + | ===== Comparative Assessment of Good Faith ===== |
| In a comparison, the-neuro-holocaust.com emerges as the more credible actor in good faith. Here's a structured breakdown: | In a comparison, the-neuro-holocaust.com emerges as the more credible actor in good faith. Here's a structured breakdown: | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| You really don't want to sue me. It would clear my way to a courtroom faster than anything I am capable of, and I will win every argument. | You really don't want to sue me. It would clear my way to a courtroom faster than anything I am capable of, and I will win every argument. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ----- | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{counter|total| person visited this page.| people visited this page.}} | ||
/var/www/html/data/attic/tj.1765470901.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel
Page Tools
