The Neuro Holocaust

The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: The Neuro Holocaust » Targeted Justice is Likely a Counter-Intelligence Operation
Trace: • Targeted Justice is Likely a Counter-Intelligence Operation
tj

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
tj [11/12/2025 16:32] – [Implications: Counterintelligence Hypothesis] danieltj [11/12/2025 16:46] (current) – [Warning to TJ] daniel
Line 3: Line 3:
 This page documents my correspondence with **Targeted Justice** (TJ), a U.S.-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit led by Len Ber MD and Ana Toledo Esq., purporting to advocate for Targeted Individuals (TIs) and victims of Anomalous Health Incidents (AHI/Havana Syndrome). The exchange spans September to December 2025 and exemplifies TJ's pattern of non-engagement with substantive evidence, culminating in baseless legal threats. This raises profound implications for the TI community: TJ may function as controlled opposition or a counterintelligence vector, simulating advocacy while obstructing verifiable breakthroughs that could expose neuroweapon systems. This page documents my correspondence with **Targeted Justice** (TJ), a U.S.-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit led by Len Ber MD and Ana Toledo Esq., purporting to advocate for Targeted Individuals (TIs) and victims of Anomalous Health Incidents (AHI/Havana Syndrome). The exchange spans September to December 2025 and exemplifies TJ's pattern of non-engagement with substantive evidence, culminating in baseless legal threats. This raises profound implications for the TI community: TJ may function as controlled opposition or a counterintelligence vector, simulating advocacy while obstructing verifiable breakthroughs that could expose neuroweapon systems.
  
-==== Chronological Summary of Correspondence ====+===== Chronological Summary of Correspondence =====
  
 The interaction began with early brief exchanges in 2025 (not fully archived here but referenced), where Len Ber acknowledged my research but dismissed RF expertise. Renewed outreach in September–October 2025 offered international corroboration for TJ's lawsuit *Targeted Justice v. Garland*. Despite endorsements from TI advocate Craig Laforest, TJ ignored merits until escalation prompted a defensive response. The interaction began with early brief exchanges in 2025 (not fully archived here but referenced), where Len Ber acknowledged my research but dismissed RF expertise. Renewed outreach in September–October 2025 offered international corroboration for TJ's lawsuit *Targeted Justice v. Garland*. Despite endorsements from TI advocate Craig Laforest, TJ ignored merits until escalation prompted a defensive response.
Line 15: Line 15:
 | 11 Dec 2025 | Targeted Justice | Daniel Azulay | Your violations of law... | Listed accomplishments (Substack link); accused defamation/slander; threatened legal consultation. | Only response: evasion + intimidation. | | 11 Dec 2025 | Targeted Justice | Daniel Azulay | Your violations of law... | Listed accomplishments (Substack link); accused defamation/slander; threatened legal consultation. | Only response: evasion + intimidation. |
  
-==== Key Emails (Excerpts) ====+===== Key Emails (Excerpts) =====
  
-===== 30 September 2025: Primary Evidence Offer =====+==== 30 September 2025: Primary Evidence Offer ====
 Detailed forensic findings (SDR/KrakenSDR-confirmed tower emissions) and medical validations positioned as "pivotal international corroboration" for TJ's case. Detailed forensic findings (SDR/KrakenSDR-confirmed tower emissions) and medical validations positioned as "pivotal international corroboration" for TJ's case.
  
-===== 2 October 2025: Escalation and Threat =====+==== 2 October 2025: Escalation and Threat ====
 Confirmation of double-psychiatrist non-delusional rulings; cautionary warning of publicity if ignored. Confirmation of double-psychiatrist non-delusional rulings; cautionary warning of publicity if ignored.
  
-===== 10 December 2025: Ultimatum =====+==== 10 December 2025: Ultimatum ====
 "Final opportunity to prove that Targeted Justice is not, in fact, a counterintelligence operation... Non-response will be seen as an admission." "Final opportunity to prove that Targeted Justice is not, in fact, a counterintelligence operation... Non-response will be seen as an admission."
  
-===== 11 December 2025: TJ Response =====+==== 11 December 2025: TJ Response ====
 Defensive list of "accomplishments"; baseless defamation claim without addressing evidence. Defensive list of "accomplishments"; baseless defamation claim without addressing evidence.
  
 **Full email correspondence chain available on request** **Full email correspondence chain available on request**
  
-==== Analysis: No Engagement on Merits ====+===== Analysis: No Engagement on Merits =====
  
 TJ never queried my data: no questions on VHF violations, qEEG inversions (contra Van Lutterveld et al.), Trends breakpoints (2016 neuroweapon surge via ITS regression), or Bayesian posteriors (99.9994% state-targeting). Silence persisted despite <redacted>'s vouch and my offers aligning with TJ's purported mission (AHI registry expansion, *Garland* acceleration). TJ never queried my data: no questions on VHF violations, qEEG inversions (contra Van Lutterveld et al.), Trends breakpoints (2016 neuroweapon surge via ITS regression), or Bayesian posteriors (99.9994% state-targeting). Silence persisted despite <redacted>'s vouch and my offers aligning with TJ's purported mission (AHI registry expansion, *Garland* acceleration).
Line 49: Line 49:
 This exchange shows a very high probability for TJ obstruction (dilution of TI signals, protection of perpetrators). This exchange shows a very high probability for TJ obstruction (dilution of TI signals, protection of perpetrators).
  
-==== Comparative Assessment of Good Faith ====+===== Comparative Assessment of Good Faith =====
  
 In a comparison, the-neuro-holocaust.com emerges as the more credible actor in good faith. Here's a structured breakdown: In a comparison, the-neuro-holocaust.com emerges as the more credible actor in good faith. Here's a structured breakdown:
Line 67: Line 67:
  
 You really don't want to sue me. It would clear my way to a courtroom faster than anything I am capable of, and I will win every argument. You really don't want to sue me. It would clear my way to a courtroom faster than anything I am capable of, and I will win every argument.
 +
 +-----
 +
 +{{counter|total| person visited this page.| people visited this page.}}
/var/www/html/data/attic/tj.1765470768.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel

Page Tools

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki