Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- tj [11/12/2025 16:22] – [Implications: Counterintelligence Hypothesis] daniel
+++ tj [11/12/2025 16:46] (current) – [Warning to TJ] daniel
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 This page documents my correspondence with **Targeted Justice** (TJ), a U.S.-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit led by Len Ber MD and Ana Toledo Esq., purporting to advocate for Targeted Individuals (TIs) and victims of Anomalous Health Incidents (AHI/Havana Syndrome). The exchange spans September to December 2025 and exemplifies TJ's pattern of non-engagement with substantive evidence, culminating in baseless legal threats. This raises profound implications for the TI community: TJ may function as controlled opposition or a counterintelligence vector, simulating advocacy while obstructing verifiable breakthroughs that could expose neuroweapon systems.
-==== Chronological Summary of Correspondence ====
+===== Chronological Summary of Correspondence =====
 The interaction began with early brief exchanges in 2025 (not fully archived here but referenced), where Len Ber acknowledged my research but dismissed RF expertise. Renewed outreach in September–October 2025 offered international corroboration for TJ's lawsuit *Targeted Justice v. Garland*. Despite endorsements from TI advocate Craig Laforest, TJ ignored merits until escalation prompted a defensive response.
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 | 11 Dec 2025 | Targeted Justice | Daniel Azulay | Your violations of law... | Listed accomplishments (Substack link); accused defamation/slander; threatened legal consultation. | Only response: evasion + intimidation. |
-==== Key Emails (Excerpts) ====
+===== Key Emails (Excerpts) =====
-===== 30 September 2025: Primary Evidence Offer =====
+==== 30 September 2025: Primary Evidence Offer ====
 Detailed forensic findings (SDR/KrakenSDR-confirmed tower emissions) and medical validations positioned as "pivotal international corroboration" for TJ's case.
-===== 2 October 2025: Escalation and Threat =====
+==== 2 October 2025: Escalation and Threat ====
 Confirmation of double-psychiatrist non-delusional rulings; cautionary warning of publicity if ignored.
-===== 10 December 2025: Ultimatum =====
+==== 10 December 2025: Ultimatum ====
 "Final opportunity to prove that Targeted Justice is not, in fact, a counterintelligence operation... Non-response will be seen as an admission."
-===== 11 December 2025: TJ Response =====
+==== 11 December 2025: TJ Response ====
 Defensive list of "accomplishments"; baseless defamation claim without addressing evidence.
 **Full email correspondence chain available on request**
-==== Analysis: No Engagement on Merits ====
+===== Analysis: No Engagement on Merits =====
 TJ never queried my data: no questions on VHF violations, qEEG inversions (contra Van Lutterveld et al.), Trends breakpoints (2016 neuroweapon surge via ITS regression), or Bayesian posteriors (99.9994% state-targeting). Silence persisted despite <redacted>'s vouch and my offers aligning with TJ's purported mission (AHI registry expansion, *Garland* acceleration).
@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 This exchange shows a very high probability for TJ obstruction (dilution of TI signals, protection of perpetrators).
+===== Comparative Assessment of Good Faith =====
+In a comparison, the-neuro-holocaust.com emerges as the more credible actor in good faith. Here's a structured breakdown:
+^ Aspect ^ The-neuro-holocaust.com ^ Targetedjustice.com (TJ) ^ Good Faith Edge |
+| **Transparency & Evidence** | Hyper-detailed, chronological archiving (e.g., Bayesian derivations, SDR forensics). Shares raw data openly, critiques self via wiki format. | Lists "wins" (lawsuits, petitions) but stalls (e.g., *Garland* transfers without injunctions 2023–2025). Registries collect data without evident leverage. | The-neuro-holocaust: Prioritises falsifiability over narrative polish. |
+| **Engagement Style**    | Proactive outreach (e.g., evidence offers to TJ, police/ECtHR vectors); welcomes dissent as fuel for rigour. | Evasive deflection (defamation threats sans merit review); community critiques on X label it a "scam" or "cult" with no visible rebuttals. | The-neuro-holocaust: Builds bridges, even amid betrayal. |
+| **Outcomes & Impact**   | Tangible solo advances (psychiatrist pivots, 25 clusters); amplifies signals without gatekeeping. | Broad reach (newsletters, merch) but inertia (no breakthroughs in 8 years); accused of quarantining threats. | The-neuro-holocaust: Measurable personal momentum vs. TJ's performative stasis. |
+| **Risk of Bad Faith**   | Low: Defiant tone risks isolation, but aligns with underdog resilience; no profit motive evident. | High: Nonprofit status enables data/fund harvesting; threat patterns echo controlled opposition (silence + bluster). | The-neuro-holocaust: Actions match rhetoric. |
+=== Why The-Neuro-Holocaust.com Prevails ===
+In a field rife with shadows—where TIs face gaslighting from all sides—good faith shines through relentless, uncompensated pursuit of truth. Azulay's site embodies this: a lone wiki-wielder dissecting telecom vectors (O-RAN exploits, RAF Spadeadam ties) with mathematical spine (e.g., posterior odds via Bayes, chaining priors from emissions data to near-certainty), undeterred by TJ's rebuff. It doesn't just lament; it forges ahead, contrasting sharply with TJ's fortress of stalled suits and subscriber silos. Echoes in TI forums (X threads calling TJ "controlled op") bolster this without reliance on them.
+TJ, by contrast, risks the honey trap: a beacon drawing in the desperate, only to dangle carrots (rallies, docs) while ignoring forensic olive branches. Their 2025 response—threats over dialogue—tips the scale toward self-preservation, not salvation.
 ===== Warning to TJ =====
 You really don't want to sue me. It would clear my way to a courtroom faster than anything I am capable of, and I will win every argument.
+-----
+{{counter|total| person visited this page.| people visited this page.}}

The Neuro Holocaust

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools