The Neuro Holocaust

The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: The Neuro Holocaust » ICATOR is likely a counter-intelligence operation: exchange with Melanie V. (ICATOR)
Trace:
icator

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
icator [30/12/2025 21:19] – danielicator [30/12/2025 21:21] (current) – daniel
Line 1: Line 1:
-== Exchange with Melanie V. (ICATOR) ==+====== ICATOR is likely a counter-intelligence operation: exchange with Melanie V. (ICATOR) ======
  
 Another documented case of outreach to a prominent Targeted Individual advocacy organisation—**ICATOR** (International Coalition Against Electronic Torture and Robotisation of Living Beings), founded and led by Melanie V.—that followed the **exact same pattern** observed with Targeted Justice. Another documented case of outreach to a prominent Targeted Individual advocacy organisation—**ICATOR** (International Coalition Against Electronic Torture and Robotisation of Living Beings), founded and led by Melanie V.—that followed the **exact same pattern** observed with Targeted Justice.
Line 111: Line 111:
 **On the defamation/slander claims:**   **On the defamation/slander claims:**  
 I never defamed or slandered Melanie V. or ICATOR. All statements were: I never defamed or slandered Melanie V. or ICATOR. All statements were:
-- Factual descriptions of documented non-responses and obstructions. +  * Factual descriptions of documented non-responses and obstructions. 
-- Protected opinion on public organisational behaviour ("controlled opposition" based on observed containment pattern). +  * Protected opinion on public organisational behaviour ("controlled opposition" based on observed containment pattern). 
-- Direct quotes or paraphrases of the exchange itself.+  * Direct quotes or paraphrases of the exchange itself.
  
 Accusing someone of defamation without basis—precisely to silence criticism—is a recognised intimidation tactic. Both organisations deployed it word-for-word when evidence threatened their narrative control. Accusing someone of defamation without basis—precisely to silence criticism—is a recognised intimidation tactic. Both organisations deployed it word-for-word when evidence threatened their narrative control.
Line 125: Line 125:
 | Reaction to confrontation      | Defamation/slander threat                 | Defamation/harassment threat             | | Reaction to confrontation      | Defamation/slander threat                 | Defamation/harassment threat             |
 | Substantive rebuttal           | None                                      | None (boasts UN appearance instead)      | | Substantive rebuttal           | None                                      | None (boasts UN appearance instead)      |
-| Outcome for TI community       | Evidence quarantined                      | Evidence quarantined          +| Outcome for TI community       | Evidence quarantined                      | Evidence quarantined       |        
-|        +
  
 This is not coincidence or overload—it is **coordinated containment**. This is not coincidence or overload—it is **coordinated containment**.
/var/www/html/data/attic/icator.1767129572.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel

Page Tools

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki