The Neuro Holocaust

The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: The Neuro Holocaust » ICATOR is likely a counter-intelligence operation: exchange with Melanie V. (ICATOR)
Trace: • ICATOR is likely a counter-intelligence operation: exchange with Melanie V. (ICATOR)
icator

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
icator [30/12/2025 21:18] – danielicator [30/12/2025 21:21] (current) – daniel
Line 1: Line 1:
-== Exchange with Melanie V. (ICATOR) ==+====== ICATOR is likely a counter-intelligence operation: exchange with Melanie V. (ICATOR) ======
  
 Another documented case of outreach to a prominent Targeted Individual advocacy organisation—**ICATOR** (International Coalition Against Electronic Torture and Robotisation of Living Beings), founded and led by Melanie V.—that followed the **exact same pattern** observed with Targeted Justice. Another documented case of outreach to a prominent Targeted Individual advocacy organisation—**ICATOR** (International Coalition Against Electronic Torture and Robotisation of Living Beings), founded and led by Melanie V.—that followed the **exact same pattern** observed with Targeted Justice.
Line 103: Line 103:
 The pattern is **identical** to Targeted Justice: The pattern is **identical** to Targeted Justice:
  
-1. **Initial openness** when outreach is abstract → scheduling meetings. +  - **Initial openness** when outreach is abstract → scheduling meetings. 
-2. **Systematic de-prioritisation** → repeated delays, excuses (family, holidays, court prep). +  - **Systematic de-prioritisation** → repeated delays, excuses (family, holidays, court prep). 
-3. **Zero substantive engagement** with offered evidence (psychiatrist-backed models, reproducible RF proof, community questionnaire)—no questions, no integration proposals. +  - **Zero substantive engagement** with offered evidence (psychiatrist-backed models, reproducible RF proof, community questionnaire)—no questions, no integration proposals. 
-4. **Obstruction of low-effort, high-benefit actions** that would directly advance community goals. +  - **Obstruction of low-effort, high-benefit actions** that would directly advance community goals. 
-5. **Escalation to baseless legal intimidation** when confronted: "defamation", "harassment", "threatening message"—**without ever addressing the merits**.+  - **Escalation to baseless legal intimidation** when confronted: "defamation", "harassment", "threatening message"—**without ever addressing the merits**.
  
 **On the defamation/slander claims:**   **On the defamation/slander claims:**  
 I never defamed or slandered Melanie V. or ICATOR. All statements were: I never defamed or slandered Melanie V. or ICATOR. All statements were:
-- Factual descriptions of documented non-responses and obstructions. +  * Factual descriptions of documented non-responses and obstructions. 
-- Protected opinion on public organisational behaviour ("controlled opposition" based on observed containment pattern). +  * Protected opinion on public organisational behaviour ("controlled opposition" based on observed containment pattern). 
-- Direct quotes or paraphrases of the exchange itself.+  * Direct quotes or paraphrases of the exchange itself.
  
 Accusing someone of defamation without basis—precisely to silence criticism—is a recognised intimidation tactic. Both organisations deployed it word-for-word when evidence threatened their narrative control. Accusing someone of defamation without basis—precisely to silence criticism—is a recognised intimidation tactic. Both organisations deployed it word-for-word when evidence threatened their narrative control.
Line 125: Line 125:
 | Reaction to confrontation      | Defamation/slander threat                 | Defamation/harassment threat             | | Reaction to confrontation      | Defamation/slander threat                 | Defamation/harassment threat             |
 | Substantive rebuttal           | None                                      | None (boasts UN appearance instead)      | | Substantive rebuttal           | None                                      | None (boasts UN appearance instead)      |
-| Outcome for TI community       | Evidence quarantined                      | Evidence quarantined          +| Outcome for TI community       | Evidence quarantined                      | Evidence quarantined       |        
-|        +
  
 This is not coincidence or overload—it is **coordinated containment**. This is not coincidence or overload—it is **coordinated containment**.
/var/www/html/data/attic/icator.1767129523.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel

Page Tools

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki