The Neuro HolocaustThe AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| icator [30/12/2025 21:16] – created daniel | icator [30/12/2025 21:21] (current) – daniel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | == Exchange | + | ====== ICATOR is likely a counter-intelligence operation: exchange |
| Another documented case of outreach to a prominent Targeted Individual advocacy organisation—**ICATOR** (International Coalition Against Electronic Torture and Robotisation of Living Beings), founded and led by Melanie V.—that followed the **exact same pattern** observed with Targeted Justice. | Another documented case of outreach to a prominent Targeted Individual advocacy organisation—**ICATOR** (International Coalition Against Electronic Torture and Robotisation of Living Beings), founded and led by Melanie V.—that followed the **exact same pattern** observed with Targeted Justice. | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| **Daniel:** Clarifies not asking for help but offering explanation (per Craig' | **Daniel:** Clarifies not asking for help but offering explanation (per Craig' | ||
| - | **MELANIE V.:** Provides email: | + | **MELANIE V.:** Provides email: |
| **29/ | **29/ | ||
| - | **Daniel:** Forwards detailed technical analysis | + | **Daniel:** Forwards detailed technical analysis on RF measurements (as shown in attached images): |
| - | - Persistent | + | * Unordered List ItemPersistent |
| - | - Operating precisely in KPN/ODIDO uplink bands (2538.04 MHz & 2545.15 MHz) | + | |
| - | - Statistically impossible spatial/ | + | |
| - | - Described as " | + | |
| - | - Offers forensic reports, IQ analysis, expert declarations | + | |
| No response or acknowledgment. | No response or acknowledgment. | ||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
| The pattern is **identical** to Targeted Justice: | The pattern is **identical** to Targeted Justice: | ||
| - | 1. **Initial openness** when outreach is abstract → scheduling meetings. | + | - **Initial openness** when outreach is abstract → scheduling meetings. |
| - | 2. **Systematic de-prioritisation** → repeated delays, excuses (family, holidays, court prep). | + | |
| - | 3. **Zero substantive engagement** with offered evidence (psychiatrist-backed models, reproducible RF proof, community questionnaire)—no questions, no integration proposals. | + | |
| - | 4. **Obstruction of low-effort, high-benefit actions** that would directly advance community goals. | + | |
| - | 5. **Escalation to baseless legal intimidation** when confronted: " | + | |
| **On the defamation/ | **On the defamation/ | ||
| I never defamed or slandered Melanie V. or ICATOR. All statements were: | I never defamed or slandered Melanie V. or ICATOR. All statements were: | ||
| - | - Factual descriptions of documented non-responses and obstructions. | + | * Factual descriptions of documented non-responses and obstructions. |
| - | - Protected opinion on public organisational behaviour (" | + | |
| - | - Direct quotes or paraphrases of the exchange itself. | + | |
| Accusing someone of defamation without basis—precisely to silence criticism—is a recognised intimidation tactic. Both organisations deployed it word-for-word when evidence threatened their narrative control. | Accusing someone of defamation without basis—precisely to silence criticism—is a recognised intimidation tactic. Both organisations deployed it word-for-word when evidence threatened their narrative control. | ||
| Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
| | Reaction to confrontation | | Reaction to confrontation | ||
| | Substantive rebuttal | | Substantive rebuttal | ||
| - | | Outcome for TI community | + | | Outcome for TI community |
| - | | | + | |
| This is not coincidence or overload—it is **coordinated containment**. | This is not coincidence or overload—it is **coordinated containment**. | ||