The Neuro Holocaust

The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: The Neuro Holocaust » RDI FOIA Obstruction
Trace:
cluster_26

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
cluster_26 [10/12/2025 17:27] – [The HackRF Claim is Legally Baseless] danielcluster_26 [11/12/2025 16:49] (current) – [Suspicious Timing and Pattern: Coordinated with Prior Stonewalling] daniel
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== RDI/Antennebureau Officially Refuses to Investigate and Threatens Me with the Telecomwet for Owning a HackRF (Even in Receive-Only Mode) ======+====== RDI FOIA Obstruction ======
  
 Today I received the long-awaited reply from Daniël Nicolai (Antennebureau / Rijksinspectie Digitale Infrastructuur) regarding my formal report [Ref.20251233] of an illegal, permanent, head-proximal transmitter operating on approximately **2538**, **2545** and **2553 MHz** — three razor-sharp carriers inside the licensed Band 7 uplink blocks of KPN and ODIDO. Today I received the long-awaited reply from Daniël Nicolai (Antennebureau / Rijksinspectie Digitale Infrastructuur) regarding my formal report [Ref.20251233] of an illegal, permanent, head-proximal transmitter operating on approximately **2538**, **2545** and **2553 MHz** — three razor-sharp carriers inside the licensed Band 7 uplink blocks of KPN and ODIDO.
Line 42: Line 42:
 ===== 10 December 2025 — RDI's Woo-Verzoek Denial: A Blatant Cover-Up of Military Spectrum Use in 2.45–2.69 GHz Band ===== ===== 10 December 2025 — RDI's Woo-Verzoek Denial: A Blatant Cover-Up of Military Spectrum Use in 2.45–2.69 GHz Band =====
  
-Today, just two days after their [[rdi-antennebureau-reply-20251210|previous deflection on my illegal transmitter report]], the Rijksinspectie Digitale Infrastructuur (RDI) dropped this gem: a flat denial of my Woo-verzoek from 2 November 2025. I asked for documents on non-civil (military/NATO) use of the 2450–2690 MHz band since 2008 — the exact range where my forensic logs show persistent, head-localised carriers at 2538 MHz and 2545 MHz, tied to years of directed-energy harassment.+Today the Rijksinspectie Digitale Infrastructuur (RDI) dropped this gem: a flat denial of my Woo-verzoek from 2 November 2025. I asked for documents on non-civil (military/NATO) use of the 2450–2690 MHz band since 2008 — the exact range where my forensic logs show [[cluster_15|persistent, head-localised carriers at 2538 MHz, 2545 MHz and 2553 MHz]] tied to [[cluster_23|years of directed-energy harassment]].
  
 Their verdict? No documents found. Zero. Nada. After a so-called "zoekslag" (search), they claim nothing exists on temporary assignments to Defensie or visiting forces, no correspondence with DSMC under NJFA, no monitoring reports of unattributed signals, no policy docs on registrations, and no international notifications via CEPT or NATO FMSC. Their verdict? No documents found. Zero. Nada. After a so-called "zoekslag" (search), they claim nothing exists on temporary assignments to Defensie or visiting forces, no correspondence with DSMC under NJFA, no monitoring reports of unattributed signals, no policy docs on registrations, and no international notifications via CEPT or NATO FMSC.
 +
 +{{ :screenshot_2025-12-10_at_18.30.18.png?nolink |}}
  
 This reeks of a cover-up. Here's why, point by point, grounded in the facts of their response and the glaring realities they ignore. This reeks of a cover-up. Here's why, point by point, grounded in the facts of their response and the glaring realities they ignore.
Line 58: Line 60:
 ==== Deflective Referral to NFP: A Non-Answer Masquerading as Help ==== ==== Deflective Referral to NFP: A Non-Answer Masquerading as Help ====
  
-They point to NFP par. 8.3 on visiting forces procedures — public info I already knew. Woo demands real disclosure (art. 2.5: public interest in openness), not redirects to generics. No specifics on assignments or reports? It's a token gesture, dodging the meat of my categorised request to avoid exposing neurowarfare links (e.g., 2.45 GHz Frey pulses in my videos).+They point to NFP par. 8.3 on visiting forces procedures — public info I already knew. Woo demands real disclosure (art. 2.5: public interest in openness), not redirects to generics. No specifics on assignments or reports? It's a token gesture, dodging the meat of my categorised request to avoid exposing neurowarfare links.
  
 ==== Suspicious Timing and Pattern: Coordinated with Prior Stonewalling ==== ==== Suspicious Timing and Pattern: Coordinated with Prior Stonewalling ====
Line 67: Line 69:
  
 If any Dutch lawyer or radio amateur wants to help draft a formal “handhavingsverzoek” or “bezwaarschrift” against this blatant misapplication of the Telecomwet, please reach out. If any Dutch lawyer or radio amateur wants to help draft a formal “handhavingsverzoek” or “bezwaarschrift” against this blatant misapplication of the Telecomwet, please reach out.
 +
 +-----
 +
 +{{counter|total| person visited this page.| people visited this page.}}
/var/www/html/data/attic/cluster_26.1765387649.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel

Page Tools

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki