Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- cluster_26 [10/12/2025 17:21] – [The Full Exchange (10 December 2025)] daniel
+++ cluster_26 [11/12/2025 16:49] (current) – [Suspicious Timing and Pattern: Coordinated with Prior Stonewalling] daniel
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== RDI/Antennebureau Officially Refuses to Investigate and Threatens Me with the Telecomwet for Owning a HackRF (Even in Receive-Only Mode) ======
+====== RDI FOIA Obstruction ======
-Today I received the long-awaited reply from Daniël Nicolai (Antennebureau / Rijksinspectie Digitale Infrastructuur) regarding my formal report [Ref.20251233] of an illegal, permanent, head-proximal transmitter operating on **2538** and **2553 MHz** — three razor-sharp carriers inside the licensed Band 7 uplink blocks of KPN and ODIDO.
+Today I received the long-awaited reply from Daniël Nicolai (Antennebureau / Rijksinspectie Digitale Infrastructuur) regarding my formal report [Ref.20251233] of an illegal, permanent, head-proximal transmitter operating on approximately **2538**, **2545** and **2553 MHz** — three razor-sharp carriers inside the licensed Band 7 uplink blocks of KPN and ODIDO.
 **Their response in one sentence:**
@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 {{ :screenshot_2025-12-10_at_18.17.15.png?nolink |}}
-I will be adding this to my ongoing ECtHR file (Articles 8, 10, and 13) and to the criminal complaint I am preparing the moment the HackRFs are in my hands.
+===== 10 December 2025 — RDI's Woo-Verzoek Denial: A Blatant Cover-Up of Military Spectrum Use in 2.45–2.69 GHz Band =====
+Today the Rijksinspectie Digitale Infrastructuur (RDI) dropped this gem: a flat denial of my Woo-verzoek from 2 November 2025. I asked for documents on non-civil (military/NATO) use of the 2450–2690 MHz band since 2008 — the exact range where my forensic logs show [[cluster_15|persistent, head-localised carriers at 2538 MHz, 2545 MHz and 2553 MHz]] tied to [[cluster_23|years of directed-energy harassment]].
+Their verdict? No documents found. Zero. Nada. After a so-called "zoekslag" (search), they claim nothing exists on temporary assignments to Defensie or visiting forces, no correspondence with DSMC under NJFA, no monitoring reports of unattributed signals, no policy docs on registrations, and no international notifications via CEPT or NATO FMSC.
+{{ :screenshot_2025-12-10_at_18.30.18.png?nolink |}}
+This reeks of a cover-up. Here's why, point by point, grounded in the facts of their response and the glaring realities they ignore.
+==== Implausible Blanket Denial: Military Use of This Band is Public Knowledge ====
+The 2450–2690 MHz band isn't some obscure sliver — it's shared civil/military turf per the Nationaal Frequentieplan (NFP, par. 5.2.3). Since 2008, Dutch soil has hosted NATO exercises like Falcon Autumn, where microwave bands handle C2, drones, and telemetry — all coordinated via DSMC and NJFA (STANAG 5042). Public Defensie reports (defensie.nl) confirm this; RDI's own annual audits log unlicensed emissions. Seventeen years of zero docs? That's not oversight; that's wilful blindness, likely hiding classified "black" assignments under the Wet bescherming staatsgeheimen (art. 3) without invoking Woo exemptions (art. 5.1(1)b). If nothing exists, why not say so transparently?
+==== Vague "Zoekslag" with Zero Transparency: Hiding the Search to Hide the Truth ====
+Woo jurisprudence (e.g., ABRvS 2020/1234) demands details on searches — databases queried, keywords used, custodians consulted. RDI offers squat. Did they check the Spectrum Management Database? Cross-reference DSMC archives? Include classified annexes? Silence. This opacity isn't sloppy; it's strategic, shielding potential exemptions for state security without admitting docs exist. It mirrors their HackRF threat: deny anomalies, then block scrutiny.
+==== Deflective Referral to NFP: A Non-Answer Masquerading as Help ====
+They point to NFP par. 8.3 on visiting forces procedures — public info I already knew. Woo demands real disclosure (art. 2.5: public interest in openness), not redirects to generics. No specifics on assignments or reports? It's a token gesture, dodging the meat of my categorised request to avoid exposing neurowarfare links.
+==== Suspicious Timing and Pattern: Coordinated with Prior Stonewalling ====
+This lands 8 December, smack between my journalist outreach and their 10 December HackRF intimidation. Phone follow-up on 6 November promised a review; outcome: null set. It's a pattern — deny military band docs, refuse near-field monitoring, threaten detection tools. This isn't coincidence; it's containment, echoing AIVD/MIVD tampering in my MRIs and parcels.
+I'm filing bezwaar immediately, citing Woo non-compliance. This goes straight to my ECtHR dossier (Articles 8/10/13) and upcoming criminal complaint.
 If any Dutch lawyer or radio amateur wants to help draft a formal “handhavingsverzoek” or “bezwaarschrift” against this blatant misapplication of the Telecomwet, please reach out.
+-----
+{{counter|total| person visited this page.| people visited this page.}}

The Neuro Holocaust

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools