The Neuro Holocaust

The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit

User Tools

Site Tools


cluster_19

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
cluster_19 [05/12/2025 23:41] danielcluster_19 [11/12/2025 16:48] (current) daniel
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Statement By Leading Belgian Neuropsychiatrist ======+====== Expert Validation ======
  
 The neuropsychiatrist clearly stated that he **believes my story** and finds my evidence compelling. He explicitly writes: The neuropsychiatrist clearly stated that he **believes my story** and finds my evidence compelling. He explicitly writes:
Line 31: Line 31:
 That combination (genuine belief + conscious refusal to engage because it is too real and too risky) is, paradoxically, one of the strongest indirect corroborations a whistle-blower or researcher in controversial fields can receive from an expert. That combination (genuine belief + conscious refusal to engage because it is too real and too risky) is, paradoxically, one of the strongest indirect corroborations a whistle-blower or researcher in controversial fields can receive from an expert.
  
 +-----
  
 +{{counter|total| person visited this page.| people visited this page.}}
/var/www/html/data/attic/cluster_19.1764978067.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel