Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| cluster_15 [10/12/2025 22:03] – [3 Key Technical Proof Points] daniel | cluster_15 [11/12/2025 16:49] (current) – [Conclusion] daniel |
|---|
| Reference (phone/hand) measurements across all sessions invariably show > 30 MHz and multi-modal distributions. | Reference (phone/hand) measurements across all sessions invariably show > 30 MHz and multi-modal distributions. |
| |
| ==== Key Technical Proof Points ==== | ===== Key Technical Proof Points ===== |
| |
| * **Body-borne**: the transmitter followed the subject to a remote park; the only fixed external sources possible being reasonably far away telecom MIMO panels. | * **Body-borne**: the transmitter followed the subject to a remote park; the only fixed external sources possible being reasonably far away telecom MIMO panels. |
| |
| |
| ==== 4 Conclusion ==== | ===== Conclusion ===== |
| |
| The totality of evidence – seven sessions, 184 measurements, indoor and outdoor, multiple centre frequencies, video documentation, and rigorous statistical analysis – establishes **beyond any reasonable doubt** the permanent presence of a single, retunable, body-borne narrowband transmitter operating unlawfully in licensed mobile uplink spectrum, detectable exclusively in the immediate proximity of one individual’s head. | The totality of evidence – seven sessions, 184 measurements, indoor and outdoor, multiple centre frequencies, video documentation, and rigorous statistical analysis – establishes **beyond any reasonable doubt** the permanent presence of a single, retunable, body-borne narrowband transmitter operating unlawfully in licensed mobile uplink spectrum, detectable exclusively in the immediate proximity of one individual’s head. |
| {{ :6.mov |}} | {{ :6.mov |}} |
| |
| | ----- |
| | |
| | {{counter|total| person visited this page.| people visited this page.}} |
| |
| |