The Neuro Holocaust

The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: The Neuro Holocaust » Anomalous Microwave Signals
Trace:
cluster_15

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
cluster_15 [10/12/2025 22:03] – danielcluster_15 [11/12/2025 16:49] (current) – [Conclusion] daniel
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Anomalous Microwave Signals ====== ====== Anomalous Microwave Signals ======
- 
-**All Seven Measurement Sessions – November 2025** \\ 
-**Three Distinct Operating States Confirmed** 
- 
-//30 November 2025// 
- 
-==== 1 Executive Summary ==== 
  
 Seven independent measurement sessions (original document + six video recordings, including one in a remote park) comprising **184 individual frequency readings** (97 near-head, 87 reference) conclusively prove the existence of a single, adaptive, extremely low-power narrowband transmitter that: Seven independent measurement sessions (original document + six video recordings, including one in a remote park) comprising **184 individual frequency readings** (97 near-head, 87 reference) conclusively prove the existence of a single, adaptive, extremely low-power narrowband transmitter that:
Line 22: Line 15:
 No conventional device, medical implant, or legitimate network equipment matches this signature. No conventional device, medical implant, or legitimate network equipment matches this signature.
  
-==== 2 Consolidated Statistics – All Sessions ====+==== Consolidated Statistics – All Sessions ====
  
 ^ Parameter                  ^ State 1 (KPN)     ^ State 2 (ODIDO)   ^ State 3 (ODIDO – park) ^ ^ Parameter                  ^ State 1 (KPN)     ^ State 2 (ODIDO)   ^ State 3 (ODIDO – park) ^
Line 36: Line 29:
 Reference (phone/hand) measurements across all sessions invariably show > 30 MHz and multi-modal distributions. Reference (phone/hand) measurements across all sessions invariably show > 30 MHz and multi-modal distributions.
  
-==== 3 Key Technical Proof Points ====+===== Key Technical Proof Points =====
  
   * **Body-borne**: the transmitter followed the subject to a remote park; the only fixed external sources possible being reasonably far away telecom MIMO panels.   * **Body-borne**: the transmitter followed the subject to a remote park; the only fixed external sources possible being reasonably far away telecom MIMO panels.
Line 51: Line 44:
  
  
-==== 4 Conclusion ====+===== Conclusion =====
  
 The totality of evidence – seven sessions, 184 measurements, indoor and outdoor, multiple centre frequencies, video documentation, and rigorous statistical analysis – establishes **beyond any reasonable doubt** the permanent presence of a single, retunable, body-borne narrowband transmitter operating unlawfully in licensed mobile uplink spectrum, detectable exclusively in the immediate proximity of one individual’s head. The totality of evidence – seven sessions, 184 measurements, indoor and outdoor, multiple centre frequencies, video documentation, and rigorous statistical analysis – establishes **beyond any reasonable doubt** the permanent presence of a single, retunable, body-borne narrowband transmitter operating unlawfully in licensed mobile uplink spectrum, detectable exclusively in the immediate proximity of one individual’s head.
Line 74: Line 67:
 {{ :6.mov |}} {{ :6.mov |}}
  
 +-----
 +
 +{{counter|total| person visited this page.| people visited this page.}}
  
  
/var/www/html/data/attic/cluster_15.1765404192.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel

Page Tools

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki