The Neuro Holocaust

The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit

User Tools

Site Tools


2016_neuroweapon_deployment

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2016_neuroweapon_deployment [05/12/2025 19:02] – [12.5. Replication of Article Methods Using Reddit Data] daniel2016_neuroweapon_deployment [05/12/2025 19:04] (current) daniel
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Unraveling Mental Health Search Trends: A 2016 Neuroweapon Deployment Model and Its Implications ====== ====== Unraveling Mental Health Search Trends: A 2016 Neuroweapon Deployment Model and Its Implications ======
 +
 +//Daniel R. Azulay//
  
 //September 28, 2025// //September 28, 2025//
Line 597: Line 599:
 ====== 14.1 The Challenge of Epistemological Obfuscation ====== ====== 14.1 The Challenge of Epistemological Obfuscation ======
  
-The most significant constraint on the neuroweapon hypothesis is the lack of traditional +The most significant constraint on the neuroweapon hypothesis is the lack of traditional epidemiological evidence, a point widely acknowledged in the literature. However, we argue that this deficit in proof is not evidence of absence, but rather a direct function of the technology’s presumed design and its strategic deployment within the context of cognitive warfare.
-epidemiological evidence, a point widely acknowledged in the literature (? ? ). However, +
-we argue that this deficit in proof is not evidence of absence, but rather a direct function +
-of the technology’s presumed design and its strategic deployment within the context of +
-cognitive warfare.+
  
 **Mimicry as Plausible Deniability** **Mimicry as Plausible Deniability**
/var/www/html/data/attic/2016_neuroweapon_deployment.1764961374.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel