The Neuro Holocaust
The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit
User Tools
2016_neuroweapon_deployment
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| 2016_neuroweapon_deployment [05/12/2025 19:02] – [12.5. Replication of Article Methods Using Reddit Data] daniel | 2016_neuroweapon_deployment [05/12/2025 19:04] (current) – daniel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Unraveling Mental Health Search Trends: A 2016 Neuroweapon Deployment Model and Its Implications ====== | ====== Unraveling Mental Health Search Trends: A 2016 Neuroweapon Deployment Model and Its Implications ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Daniel R. Azulay// | ||
| //September 28, 2025// | //September 28, 2025// | ||
| Line 507: | Line 509: | ||
| Figure 16: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for neurological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020. | Figure 16: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for neurological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020. | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | Figure 17: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints. | ||
| ===== 12.6. Conclusion ===== | ===== 12.6. Conclusion ===== | ||
| Line 513: | Line 517: | ||
| ====== 13 Comparison of Time Series to Year-by-Year List of NATO Cognitive Warfare Publications (2011– | ====== 13 Comparison of Time Series to Year-by-Year List of NATO Cognitive Warfare Publications (2011– | ||
| 2025) ====== | 2025) ====== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Figure 17: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints. | ||
| To contextualize the 2016+ timeline—where hypothesized neuroweapon deployment coincides with structural breaks—below is a chronological compilation of key NATO-affiliated publications, | To contextualize the 2016+ timeline—where hypothesized neuroweapon deployment coincides with structural breaks—below is a chronological compilation of key NATO-affiliated publications, | ||
| Line 597: | Line 599: | ||
| ====== 14.1 The Challenge of Epistemological Obfuscation ====== | ====== 14.1 The Challenge of Epistemological Obfuscation ====== | ||
| - | The most significant constraint on the neuroweapon hypothesis is the lack of traditional | + | The most significant constraint on the neuroweapon hypothesis is the lack of traditional epidemiological evidence, a point widely acknowledged in the literature. However, we argue that this deficit in proof is not evidence of absence, but rather a direct function of the technology’s presumed design and its strategic deployment within the context of cognitive warfare. |
| - | epidemiological evidence, a point widely acknowledged in the literature | + | |
| - | we argue that this deficit in proof is not evidence of absence, but rather a direct function | + | |
| - | of the technology’s presumed design and its strategic deployment within the context of | + | |
| - | cognitive warfare. | + | |
| **Mimicry as Plausible Deniability** | **Mimicry as Plausible Deniability** | ||
/var/www/html/data/attic/2016_neuroweapon_deployment.1764961345.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel
Page Tools
