The Neuro Holocaust

The AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit

User Tools

Site Tools


2016_neuroweapon_deployment

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2016_neuroweapon_deployment [05/12/2025 18:50] daniel2016_neuroweapon_deployment [05/12/2025 19:04] (current) daniel
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Unraveling Mental Health Search Trends: A 2016 Neuroweapon Deployment Model and Its Implications ====== ====== Unraveling Mental Health Search Trends: A 2016 Neuroweapon Deployment Model and Its Implications ======
 +
 +//Daniel R. Azulay//
  
 //September 28, 2025// //September 28, 2025//
Line 91: Line 93:
 The series (2011–2026) shows high variability and upward trends, reflecting fluctuating public interest in mental health concerns (Ayers et al., 2013). The ACF indicates significant serial dependence, necessitating models accounting for autocorrelation (Shumway and Stoffer, 2017). This is critical for understanding temporal dynamics and guiding breakpoint detection. The series (2011–2026) shows high variability and upward trends, reflecting fluctuating public interest in mental health concerns (Ayers et al., 2013). The ACF indicates significant serial dependence, necessitating models accounting for autocorrelation (Shumway and Stoffer, 2017). This is critical for understanding temporal dynamics and guiding breakpoint detection.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig1.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 1: Observed time series values (2011–2026). Figure 1: Observed time series values (2011–2026).
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig2.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 2: Autocorrelation function (first 24 lags). Figure 2: Autocorrelation function (first 24 lags).
  
Line 115: Line 119:
 Significant coefficient estimates (p < 0.001) confirm distinct regimes (Muggeo, 2003). This method is crucial for modeling complex trend shifts, relevant to neuroweapon and stressor hypotheses. Significant coefficient estimates (p < 0.001) confirm distinct regimes (Muggeo, 2003). This method is crucial for modeling complex trend shifts, relevant to neuroweapon and stressor hypotheses.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig3.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 3: Best-fitting piecewise linear model with breakpoints at 2016-01 and 2017-02. Figure 3: Best-fitting piecewise linear model with breakpoints at 2016-01 and 2017-02.
  
Line 128: Line 133:
 magnitudes. magnitudes.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig4.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 4: 12-month moving average. Figure 4: 12-month moving average.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig5.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 5: Pre- vs. post-COVID trend. Figure 5: Pre- vs. post-COVID trend.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig6.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 6: Year-over-year change (%). Figure 6: Year-over-year change (%).
  
Line 174: Line 182:
 Overlaying combined series growth rates with Reddit MAU growth shows that the two subreddits vastly outpaced the platform as a whole. From 2015–2020, combined subreddit growth consistently exceeded 75–100% YoY, compared to Reddit MAU growth of 18–41%. Post-2021, subreddit growth slowed but remained above Reddit’s baseline until 2024. Overlaying combined series growth rates with Reddit MAU growth shows that the two subreddits vastly outpaced the platform as a whole. From 2015–2020, combined subreddit growth consistently exceeded 75–100% YoY, compared to Reddit MAU growth of 18–41%. Post-2021, subreddit growth slowed but remained above Reddit’s baseline until 2024.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig7.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 7: Piecewise regression fit for the combined series (r/medicalquestions + r/trueoffmychest). Vertical line marks 2016 breakpoint. Figure 7: Piecewise regression fit for the combined series (r/medicalquestions + r/trueoffmychest). Vertical line marks 2016 breakpoint.
  
Line 189: Line 198:
 The replication of our methods on Reddit subscriber data confirms that, among the set of subreddits analyzed, only r/medicalquestions and r/trueoffmychest exhibit a statistically significant structural break at 2016. These communities capture precisely the symptom-expression domains highlighted in the article’s keyword analysis. The convergence of evidence from Google search data and Reddit community growth strongly suggests that 2016 marked a structural shift in online expression of psychological and medical symptom concerns. The replication of our methods on Reddit subscriber data confirms that, among the set of subreddits analyzed, only r/medicalquestions and r/trueoffmychest exhibit a statistically significant structural break at 2016. These communities capture precisely the symptom-expression domains highlighted in the article’s keyword analysis. The convergence of evidence from Google search data and Reddit community growth strongly suggests that 2016 marked a structural shift in online expression of psychological and medical symptom concerns.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig8.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 8: Year-over-year growth rates for the combined series. Acceleration is visible beginning in 2016. Figure 8: Year-over-year growth rates for the combined series. Acceleration is visible beginning in 2016.
  
Line 201: Line 211:
 We model a hypothetical 2016 neuroweapon deployment inducing symptoms like auditory hallucinations or paranoia, mimicking schizophrenia/psychosis, driving searches for terms like “hearing voices” without significant Havana syndrome/weapon term searches (3/97 terms) (Persinger, 1995; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The 2016 breakpoint aligns with early Havana syndrome reports, suggesting a temporal link (Relp et al., 2018). We model a hypothetical 2016 neuroweapon deployment inducing symptoms like auditory hallucinations or paranoia, mimicking schizophrenia/psychosis, driving searches for terms like “hearing voices” without significant Havana syndrome/weapon term searches (3/97 terms) (Persinger, 1995; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The 2016 breakpoint aligns with early Havana syndrome reports, suggesting a temporal link (Relp et al., 2018).
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig9.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 9: Comparison of year-over-year growth rates: combined r/medicalquestions + Figure 9: Comparison of year-over-year growth rates: combined r/medicalquestions +
 r/trueoffmychest vs Reddit MAUs. r/trueoffmychest vs Reddit MAUs.
Line 278: Line 289:
 We used yearly Google Trends search interest (scaled 0–100) for the following terms: Trump, Biden, Clinton, Harris, Hunter Biden, World War III, covering 2010–2024. These were compared against the combined yearly subscriber counts for r/medicalquestions and r/trueoffmychest (2014–2024), which were the subreddits identified as exhibiting a structural acceleration in 2016. We used yearly Google Trends search interest (scaled 0–100) for the following terms: Trump, Biden, Clinton, Harris, Hunter Biden, World War III, covering 2010–2024. These were compared against the combined yearly subscriber counts for r/medicalquestions and r/trueoffmychest (2014–2024), which were the subreddits identified as exhibiting a structural acceleration in 2016.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig10.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 10: Google Trends search interest for political terms (2010–2024). Figure 10: Google Trends search interest for political terms (2010–2024).
  
Line 474: Line 486:
 ===== 12.3. Additional Visualizations ===== ===== 12.3. Additional Visualizations =====
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig11.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 12: Observed time series for psychological complaints (2010–2025). Visuals highlight the 2016 surge (e.g., +206% YoY for psychological, +100% for neurological) and 2020 peak (+92% psychological, +139% neurological), with post-2020 stabilization. Figure 12: Observed time series for psychological complaints (2010–2025). Visuals highlight the 2016 surge (e.g., +206% YoY for psychological, +100% for neurological) and 2020 peak (+92% psychological, +139% neurological), with post-2020 stabilization.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig12.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 13: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for psychological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020. Figure 13: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for psychological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig13.png?nolink |}}
 Figure 14: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints. Figure 14: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints.
  
Line 488: Line 503:
 Given Reddit’s global user base (predominantly English-speaking), the original replication on subreddits like r/medicalquestions and r/trueoffmychest applies similarly. European users contribute significantly, and the 2016 acceleration observed in the United States extends to Europe. Given Reddit’s global user base (predominantly English-speaking), the original replication on subreddits like r/medicalquestions and r/trueoffmychest applies similarly. European users contribute significantly, and the 2016 acceleration observed in the United States extends to Europe.
  
-Figure 15: Observed time series for psychological complaints (2010–2025).+{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig14.png?nolink |}} 
 +Figure 15: Observed time series for neurological complaints (2010–2025).
  
-Figure 16: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for psychological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020.+{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig15.png?nolink |}} 
 +Figure 16: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for neurological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020.
  
 +{{ :2016_neuroweapon_deployment:fig16.png?nolink |}}
 +Figure 17: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints.
 ===== 12.6. Conclusion ===== ===== 12.6. Conclusion =====
  
Line 498: Line 517:
 ====== 13 Comparison of Time Series to Year-by-Year List of NATO Cognitive Warfare Publications (2011– ====== 13 Comparison of Time Series to Year-by-Year List of NATO Cognitive Warfare Publications (2011–
 2025) ====== 2025) ======
- 
-Figure 17: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints. 
  
 To contextualize the 2016+ timeline—where hypothesized neuroweapon deployment coincides with structural breaks—below is a chronological compilation of key NATO-affiliated publications, reports, and strategic documents on “cognitive warfare” (CW). CW, as framed by NATO, encompasses non-kinetic operations targeting cognition, perception, and decision-making via information-disinformation, neurotechnology, and psychological operations, often overlapping with neuroweapon concepts. To contextualize the 2016+ timeline—where hypothesized neuroweapon deployment coincides with structural breaks—below is a chronological compilation of key NATO-affiliated publications, reports, and strategic documents on “cognitive warfare” (CW). CW, as framed by NATO, encompasses non-kinetic operations targeting cognition, perception, and decision-making via information-disinformation, neurotechnology, and psychological operations, often overlapping with neuroweapon concepts.
Line 582: Line 599:
 ====== 14.1 The Challenge of Epistemological Obfuscation ====== ====== 14.1 The Challenge of Epistemological Obfuscation ======
  
-The most significant constraint on the neuroweapon hypothesis is the lack of traditional +The most significant constraint on the neuroweapon hypothesis is the lack of traditional epidemiological evidence, a point widely acknowledged in the literature. However, we argue that this deficit in proof is not evidence of absence, but rather a direct function of the technology’s presumed design and its strategic deployment within the context of cognitive warfare.
-epidemiological evidence, a point widely acknowledged in the literature (? ? ). However, +
-we argue that this deficit in proof is not evidence of absence, but rather a direct function +
-of the technology’s presumed design and its strategic deployment within the context of +
-cognitive warfare.+
  
 **Mimicry as Plausible Deniability** **Mimicry as Plausible Deniability**
/var/www/html/data/attic/2016_neuroweapon_deployment.1764960640.txt.gz · Last modified: by daniel