The Neuro HolocaustThe AI worst case scenario is happening and our governments are complicit
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| 2016_neuroweapon_deployment [05/12/2025 18:50] – daniel | 2016_neuroweapon_deployment [05/12/2025 19:04] (current) – daniel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Unraveling Mental Health Search Trends: A 2016 Neuroweapon Deployment Model and Its Implications ====== | ====== Unraveling Mental Health Search Trends: A 2016 Neuroweapon Deployment Model and Its Implications ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Daniel R. Azulay// | ||
| //September 28, 2025// | //September 28, 2025// | ||
| Line 91: | Line 93: | ||
| The series (2011–2026) shows high variability and upward trends, reflecting fluctuating public interest in mental health concerns (Ayers et al., 2013). The ACF indicates significant serial dependence, necessitating models accounting for autocorrelation (Shumway and Stoffer, 2017). This is critical for understanding temporal dynamics and guiding breakpoint detection. | The series (2011–2026) shows high variability and upward trends, reflecting fluctuating public interest in mental health concerns (Ayers et al., 2013). The ACF indicates significant serial dependence, necessitating models accounting for autocorrelation (Shumway and Stoffer, 2017). This is critical for understanding temporal dynamics and guiding breakpoint detection. | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 1: Observed time series values (2011–2026). | Figure 1: Observed time series values (2011–2026). | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 2: Autocorrelation function (first 24 lags). | Figure 2: Autocorrelation function (first 24 lags). | ||
| Line 115: | Line 119: | ||
| Significant coefficient estimates (p < 0.001) confirm distinct regimes (Muggeo, 2003). This method is crucial for modeling complex trend shifts, relevant to neuroweapon and stressor hypotheses. | Significant coefficient estimates (p < 0.001) confirm distinct regimes (Muggeo, 2003). This method is crucial for modeling complex trend shifts, relevant to neuroweapon and stressor hypotheses. | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 3: Best-fitting piecewise linear model with breakpoints at 2016-01 and 2017-02. | Figure 3: Best-fitting piecewise linear model with breakpoints at 2016-01 and 2017-02. | ||
| Line 128: | Line 133: | ||
| magnitudes. | magnitudes. | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 4: 12-month moving average. | Figure 4: 12-month moving average. | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 5: Pre- vs. post-COVID trend. | Figure 5: Pre- vs. post-COVID trend. | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 6: Year-over-year change (%). | Figure 6: Year-over-year change (%). | ||
| Line 174: | Line 182: | ||
| Overlaying combined series growth rates with Reddit MAU growth shows that the two subreddits vastly outpaced the platform as a whole. From 2015–2020, | Overlaying combined series growth rates with Reddit MAU growth shows that the two subreddits vastly outpaced the platform as a whole. From 2015–2020, | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 7: Piecewise regression fit for the combined series (r/ | Figure 7: Piecewise regression fit for the combined series (r/ | ||
| Line 189: | Line 198: | ||
| The replication of our methods on Reddit subscriber data confirms that, among the set of subreddits analyzed, only r/ | The replication of our methods on Reddit subscriber data confirms that, among the set of subreddits analyzed, only r/ | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 8: Year-over-year growth rates for the combined series. Acceleration is visible beginning in 2016. | Figure 8: Year-over-year growth rates for the combined series. Acceleration is visible beginning in 2016. | ||
| Line 201: | Line 211: | ||
| We model a hypothetical 2016 neuroweapon deployment inducing symptoms like auditory hallucinations or paranoia, mimicking schizophrenia/ | We model a hypothetical 2016 neuroweapon deployment inducing symptoms like auditory hallucinations or paranoia, mimicking schizophrenia/ | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 9: Comparison of year-over-year growth rates: combined r/ | Figure 9: Comparison of year-over-year growth rates: combined r/ | ||
| r/ | r/ | ||
| Line 278: | Line 289: | ||
| We used yearly Google Trends search interest (scaled 0–100) for the following terms: Trump, Biden, Clinton, Harris, Hunter Biden, World War III, covering 2010–2024. These were compared against the combined yearly subscriber counts for r/ | We used yearly Google Trends search interest (scaled 0–100) for the following terms: Trump, Biden, Clinton, Harris, Hunter Biden, World War III, covering 2010–2024. These were compared against the combined yearly subscriber counts for r/ | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 10: Google Trends search interest for political terms (2010–2024). | Figure 10: Google Trends search interest for political terms (2010–2024). | ||
| Line 474: | Line 486: | ||
| ===== 12.3. Additional Visualizations ===== | ===== 12.3. Additional Visualizations ===== | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 12: Observed time series for psychological complaints (2010–2025). Visuals highlight the 2016 surge (e.g., +206% YoY for psychological, | Figure 12: Observed time series for psychological complaints (2010–2025). Visuals highlight the 2016 surge (e.g., +206% YoY for psychological, | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 13: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for psychological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020. | Figure 13: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for psychological complaints with breakpoints at 2016 and 2020. | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Figure 14: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints. | Figure 14: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints. | ||
| Line 488: | Line 503: | ||
| Given Reddit’s global user base (predominantly English-speaking), | Given Reddit’s global user base (predominantly English-speaking), | ||
| - | Figure 15: Observed time series for psychological | + | {{ : |
| + | Figure 15: Observed time series for neurological | ||
| - | Figure 16: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for psychological | + | {{ : |
| + | Figure 16: Best-fitting piecewise linear model for neurological | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | Figure 17: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints. | ||
| ===== 12.6. Conclusion ===== | ===== 12.6. Conclusion ===== | ||
| Line 498: | Line 517: | ||
| ====== 13 Comparison of Time Series to Year-by-Year List of NATO Cognitive Warfare Publications (2011– | ====== 13 Comparison of Time Series to Year-by-Year List of NATO Cognitive Warfare Publications (2011– | ||
| 2025) ====== | 2025) ====== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Figure 17: Year-over-year change (%) for psychological complaints. | ||
| To contextualize the 2016+ timeline—where hypothesized neuroweapon deployment coincides with structural breaks—below is a chronological compilation of key NATO-affiliated publications, | To contextualize the 2016+ timeline—where hypothesized neuroweapon deployment coincides with structural breaks—below is a chronological compilation of key NATO-affiliated publications, | ||
| Line 582: | Line 599: | ||
| ====== 14.1 The Challenge of Epistemological Obfuscation ====== | ====== 14.1 The Challenge of Epistemological Obfuscation ====== | ||
| - | The most significant constraint on the neuroweapon hypothesis is the lack of traditional | + | The most significant constraint on the neuroweapon hypothesis is the lack of traditional epidemiological evidence, a point widely acknowledged in the literature. However, we argue that this deficit in proof is not evidence of absence, but rather a direct function of the technology’s presumed design and its strategic deployment within the context of cognitive warfare. |
| - | epidemiological evidence, a point widely acknowledged in the literature | + | |
| - | we argue that this deficit in proof is not evidence of absence, but rather a direct function | + | |
| - | of the technology’s presumed design and its strategic deployment within the context of | + | |
| - | cognitive warfare. | + | |
| **Mimicry as Plausible Deniability** | **Mimicry as Plausible Deniability** | ||